ja94sports

NHL Goaltending Composite Efficacy

Research Report: Comparative Goaltending Efficacy (2021-2026)

NHL Goaltending Composite Efficacy — 2021–2026 Five-Year Aggregate. Five-pillar composite ranking with the complete qualifying table.

Jun 20, 2026

Inclusion Criteria

Restricted to goaltenders with a minimum of 50 Games Played across the five-year observation window.

Primary Findings: The Era’s Elite

The following table represents the top 20 goaltenders ranked by their average standing across all pillars.

RankPlayerGPComposite Score
1Linus Ullmark2237.2
2Igor Shesterkin2788.2
3Jake Oettinger2769.6
4Pyotr Kochetkov1259.8
5Frederik Andersen15910.6
6Andrei Vasilevskiy29611.0
7Connor Hellebuyck31011.8
8Logan Thompson20312.4
9Sergei Bobrovsky26813.0
10Ilya Samsonov15513.2
11Scott Wedgewood15913.8
12Joel Hofer11514.0
13Darcy Kuemper24714.6
14Jack Campbell9014.7
15Jeremy Swayman23515.0
16Anthony Stolarz13415.6
17Filip Gustavsson21017.6
18Ilya Sorokin28618.4
19Adin Hill16418.8
20Alex Lyon12721.5

Detailed Logical Analysis

1. The Distinction of the “Big Three” (Ullmark, Shesterkin, Oettinger)

The data reveals a clear separation at the top of the hierarchy. Linus Ullmark leads due to a nearly unprecedented Win Rate and Victory Efficiency, though critics may point to the defensive systems in front of him. Conversely, Igor Shesterkin’s rank is bolstered by his Save Ratio (10.88), which is the highest in the dataset, suggesting he provides the most individual value regardless of team context.

2. Workload vs. Efficiency (The Hellebuyck/Saros Paradox)

Connor Hellebuyck (310 GP) and Juuse Saros (312 GP) faced the highest total shot volumes. While their Composite Scores (11.8 and 29.4 respectively) are slightly diluted by team-driven metrics like Loss Rate, their ability to maintain a top-quartile Saves per Minute over such a massive sample size confirms their status as the league's premier "Workhorses."

3. Efficiency Outliers

Pyotr Kochetkov (#4) and Ilya Sorokin (#18) present fascinating cases. Kochetkov possesses the second-highest Shutout Rate (0.092) and the lowest Shots Against per Minute (0.427), indicating he thrives in controlled, high-pressure environments. Sorokin, despite a lower Composite Score due to team losses, holds the #1 Shutout Rate in the league (0.093), proving that his peak performance is arguably the highest of any active goaltender.

Conclusions

The five-year period from 2021 to 2026 marks an era defined by efficiency over volume. While the previous decade valued "Games Played" as a primary metric for greatness, our research indicates that the modern elite—led by Ullmark and Shesterkin—are defined by their ability to maximize the value of every shot faced and every win earned.

Goalies like Jake Oettinger and Logan Thompson represent a new tier of consistency that bridges the gap between high-volume veterans and high-efficiency specialists.

Thesis: The Transition to Multi-Pillar Efficiency (2021-2026)

The Fallacy of the Monolithic Metric

The historical evaluation of NHL goaltending has long suffered from a reliance on monolithic metrics—primarily Save Percentage (Sv%) and Goals Against Average (GAA). Our analysis of the 2021-2026 era demonstrates that these figures, while useful as surface-level indicators, are insufficient for capturing the nuance of elite performance. The data suggests that goaltending excellence in the modern era is not a single attribute but a triad of Reliability (Win Rate), Peak Performance (Shutout Rate), and Structural Resiliency (Save Efficiency Ratio).

The Structural Impact of Team Systems

A central finding of this research is the quantifiable divergence between "System Goalies" and "Individual Value Goalies." - The System Dominance Model: Goaltenders like Linus Ullmark and Frederik Andersen represent the pinnacle of system integration. Their high Win Rates (0.632 and 0.616) and low Goals Against per Win (3.77 and 3.91) suggest a synergy where the goalie’s style perfectly complements the defensive structure, resulting in maximum victory efficiency. - The Individual Resiliency Model: Igor Shesterkin and Ilya Sorokin represent a different paradigm. Their Save Ratios (10.88 and 10.65) remain elite even when team metrics (like Loss Rate) fluctuate. This suggests that their performance is decoupled from the team’s defensive floor, providing a "bail-out" capacity that is statistically distinct from the system-driven success of their peers.

The Psychological and Physical Burden of Shot Frequency

Our investigation into Shots Against per Minute (SA/Min) vs. Saves per Games Played (Svs/GP) reveals a hidden tax on consistency. Goalies like John Gibson and Elvis Merzlikins face a relentless "shot-per-minute" volume that degrades Composite Scores over a five-year sample. Conversely, the "New Elite"—exemplified by Jake Oettinger and Pyotr Kochetkov—benefit from lower SA/Min (0.472 and 0.427), which allows for higher mental and physical recovery between interventions. This suggests that the next decade of goaltending will be dominated by those who can maintain peak "Shutout Efficiency" (SO/GS) within controlled, low-volume environments.

The New Archetype: The High-Efficiency Hybrid

The top 10 of our Master Ranking identifies a new archetype: the Goaltender who bridges the gap between the Workhorse (Hellebuyck/Saros) and the Specialist (Stolarz). This hybrid class—led by Jake Oettinger and Logan Thompson—maintains a top-quartile standing in both individual shot-stopping and team-dependent outcomes. They are the most valuable assets in the modern NHL because they provide a stable foundation (Loss Suppression) without sacrificing the high-ceiling peak (Shutout Rate) required for deep playoff runs.

Final Conclusion

The 2021-2026 era of NHL goaltending has officially moved beyond the era of the "unlimited workload." The data proves that efficiency is the new volume. The "Best Goaltender" is no longer the one who plays the most games, but the one who achieves the lowest Composite Score—demonstrating a mastery over the cost of winning (GA/W), the frequency of perfection (SO/GS), and the raw ratio of saves to failures (Svs/GA). In this new landscape, Linus Ullmark and Igor Shesterkin stand as the dual-standard for what defines greatness in the first half of the 2020s.

The complete table

66 qualifying goaltenders · every pillar value and rank

#PlayerGPGSWLOTSASvsGASv%GAASOWin RateRkSO RateRkSvs/GARkLoss RateRkGA/WinRkComposite
1Linus Ullmark2232181415221623157015320.9152.46120.63210.0553010.7230.23913.7717.2
2Igor Shesterkin2782771619125812374406840.9162.51200.57980.0721110.8810.329154.2568.2
3Jake Oettinger2762721737026756668846830.912.55150.62720.0552910.08100.25743.9539.6
4Pyotr Kochetkov125120713812308027862950.9052.46110.568100.09229.44240.31784.1559.8
5Frederik Andersen159157984910408537023830.9062.4590.61630.057239.67180.31273.91210.6
6Andrei Vasilevskiy2962961809520841976917310.9142.49160.60840.0543110.5260.321104.06411.0
7Connor Hellebuyck31030917310630912883497790.9152.54210.558110.0681710.7220.343204.50911.8
8Logan Thompson2031951185923575852495090.9122.57100.58170.0513510.3170.30364.31712.4
9Sergei Bobrovsky2682651598613724365427010.9032.71190.59350.072129.33290.325114.41813.0
10Ilya Samsonov155148893822416837514170.92.82120.57490.08139.00400.25734.691113.2
11Scott Wedgewood159143834222433639513850.9112.5880.522170.0562810.2690.29454.641013.8
12Joel Hofer115106593510307627952830.9092.6780.513190.07579.88150.330164.801314.0
13Darcy Kuemper2472431227736686962426290.9092.66190.494270.07859.92130.31795.161914.6
14Jack Campbell9086532210261423562580.9013.0460.58960.07015.59.13350.25624.871514.7
15Jeremy Swayman2352271257726655459536020.9082.66160.532140.070149.89140.339194.821415.0
16Anthony Stolarz134117643911365033353160.9142.6390.478330.077610.5550.333174.941715.6
17Filip Gustavsson2102031067324610055505510.912.69150.505210.074910.07110.360255.202217.6
18Ilya Sorokin28628114110735852777987320.9152.63260.493310.093110.6540.381355.192118.4
19Adin Hill164159875215422838204090.9042.6590.530150.057269.34280.327134.701218.8
20Alex Lyon127119654113356232233410.9052.970.512200.05920.59.45230.345215.252321.5
21Tristan Jarry2252151117727629756966020.9052.87160.493290.07489.46220.358245.422822.2
22Thatcher Demko1901871006817554750415070.9092.7690.526160.048369.94120.364295.071822.2
23Jacob Markstrom2632611329430700263176850.9022.67170.502220.065189.22320.360275.192023.8
24Stuart Skinner2232171207123604854575920.9022.7690.538130.041489.22330.327144.931624.8
25Joseph Woll11711363439355032183330.9062.9440.538120.035529.66190.381345.292528.4
26Charlie Lindgren146136724916398935963950.9012.8580.493300.05920.59.10370.360285.493029.1
27Marc-Andre Fleury168159836315482543614640.9042.9190.494260.057269.40260.396385.593129.4
28Cam Talbot2202001097423600554285790.9042.8290.495240.045429.37270.370315.312630.0
29Casey DeSmith150136674723419138013910.9072.7970.447420.051349.72170.346225.843630.2
30Alexandar Georgiev2071991087017582352365890.8993.0190.522180.045398.89440.352235.452930.6
31Anton Forsberg170155756414475943124480.9062.88110.441430.071139.62200.413415.973931.2
32Semyon Varlamov9288383811276625212450.9112.7670.413480.080410.2980.432526.4547.531.9
33Juuse Saros31231115412529934384798650.9082.86130.494280.042479.80160.402405.623232.6
34Dan Vladar152141764622394235434010.8992.7940.500230.02856.58.84490.326125.282432.9
35Ville Husso148142724820426538394260.93.0660.486320.042469.01380.338185.923834.4
36Vitek Vanecek173159805920454240824600.8992.8790.462360.057268.87470.371325.753435.0
37Jonathan Quick163152745821446340084550.8982.95110.454390.072108.81530.382366.154236.0
38Ukko-Pekka Luukkonen186181927118522146995240.92.9480.495250.044458.97410.392375.703336.2
39Mackenzie Blackwood186174807218515946545060.9022.94110.430460.063199.20340.414426.334537.2
40Spencer Knight146137645820409737003980.9032.8480.438450.058229.30310.423476.224337.6
41David Rittich126111584113304927383120.8982.7450.460370.045418.78540.369305.382737.8
42Dustin Wolf128124605212359832503490.9032.8550.469350.040499.31300.419465.823539.0
43Connor Ingram134129555418383334543790.9013.0190.410500.07015.59.11360.419456.894939.1
44Joey Daccord164155686623455041164370.9052.870.415470.045409.42250.426506.434641.6
45Martin Jones1059450397286025613010.8953.1250.476340.053328.51610.415436.024042.0
46Samuel Ersson143133655017343730393980.8843.0170.455380.053337.64660.376336.124142.2
47Carter Hart144141585923425538494060.9052.9640.403540.02856.59.48210.418447.005045.1
48James Reimer154141596024446340164480.93.0780.383580.057248.96420.426497.595746.0
49Akira Schmid8265322810186016711890.8982.6630.390570.046378.84480.431515.913746.0
50Eric Comrie938942424259923362630.8993.0240.452410.045438.88450.472586.264446.2
51Jordan Binnington25224511410427721464797350.8983.04110.452400.045448.81520.424486.4547.546.3
52Jonas Johansson8475372711231320512620.8873.3930.440440.040507.83650.360267.085147.2
53Alex Nedeljkovic190167756727540448545500.8983.1360.395550.036518.83500.401397.335449.8
54Karel Vejmelka26224910811722756368017660.8993.180.412490.032548.88460.470577.095251.6
55Jake Allen179174669514539548555430.93.1680.369610.046388.94430.546638.236153.2
56Joonas Korpisalo174155717017490643935140.8953.250.408520.032538.55590.452557.245354.4
57Samuel Montembeault206192818429608954616290.8973.2450.393560.026588.68560.438537.775856.2
58Lukas Dostal177162727817523547025330.8983.2320.407530.012648.82510.481597.405556.4
59John Gibson2412378511727738766497390.93.2760.353620.025599.00390.494608.696256.4
60Elvis Merzlikins213204879025644457636810.8943.4150.408510.025608.46620.441547.835957.2
61Kevin Lankinen173156647122479642935030.8953.1250.370600.032558.53600.455567.866058.2
62Philipp Grubauer188178709016489743765210.8943.040.372590.022618.40630.506617.445660.0
63Daniil Tarasov989232499290426052990.8973.310.327640.011658.71550.533629.346462.0
64Petr Mrazek16315555859480543055010.8963.3620.337630.013638.59580.548649.116362.2
65Kaapo Kahkonen111104305914336430163480.8973.4720.270650.019628.67570.5676511.606562.8
66Arvid Soderblom112101256514335129733790.8873.6110.223660.010667.84640.6446615.166665.6

Pillars: Win Rate (W/GP) · Shutout Rate (SO/GS) · Save Efficiency Ratio (Svs/GA) · Loss Suppression (L/GS) · Victory Efficiency (GA/W). Composite = mean of the five pillar ranks; lower is better. Full definitions: methodology.